Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Baseball’s “Human Element” - What a crock!

Baseball’s “Human Element” - What a crock!

The NFL has embraced it and the NBA has begun to see its benefits but Major League Baseball has resisted the implementation of instant reply at every turn. Arguments against instant reply, made by the “old guard” are weak and unfounded which I will address later.  Baseball’s current rule regarding instant reply is it can only be used in case of home run calls.
·         To assess if a home run was fair or foul
·         To assess whether a home run ball actually made it over the fence
·         To assess whether a home run was subject to any fan interference
The history books and standings have already been affected by MLB’s unwillingness to use this instant replay technology, technology that is available and ready to use. On June 3rd, 2010 Detroit Tiger's pitcher Armando Galarraga was one out away from a “perfect game”.
A perfect game is defined by Major League Baseball as a game in which a pitcher pitches a victory that lasts a minimum of nine innings and in which no opposing player reaches base. Thus, the pitcher cannot allow any hits, walks, hit batsmen, or any opposing player to reach base safely for any other reason—in short, "27 up, 27 down".
This achievement has only occurred 20 times in the history of major league baseball, 18 times since the modern era began in 1900…so pretty rare! However on June 3rd 2010, Armando Galaragga was robbed of perfect game by a terrible call at first base which permitted a base runner and ended his bid for a perfect game. 
(explicit  language)


As you just heard even in a case when the umpire himself has said he missed the call, baseball has no way of correcting such an error because they do not allow a simple 10 second review of the footage.  Don’t you think Jim Joyce (the umpire) would have wanted to be saved from the embarrassment and legacy of getting that call, in that game, wrong? Please don't misunderstand me, these umpires make 95% of calls correctly, I am not taking the umpires to task here, they can't be perfect.  Why not help them out by having instant replay available to them? 
More recently in a game which lasted 19 innings, between the Atlanta Braves and Pittsburgh Pirates; the game winning run was called safe at home in possibly the worst call to date in baseball.  The ball got to home plate far ahead of the runner, and the runner during his slide never actually got to the plate… however in spite of that, somehow the umpire called the runner safe and the Pittsburgh Pirates are forced to take a loss which dropped them to 3rd place in the NL Central standings. 

So doesn’t Major League Baseball want to avoid these miscarriages of sports justice? Well not if you are a “baseball purest.” Baseball purest do not want the game to be altered. They tout the history of the game and they like how the “human element” of the game still exists. Let me tell you, modern fans and younger fans don’t care about the “human element” they want to get the calls right.  Do you think fans left the stadium after the should-be perfect game or the 19 inning debacle saying “gee I sure love that human element”, no of course not. It's the last thing a fan wants, for their team to lose a game because of poor umpiring. 
So besides the “human element” what other reasons do opponents of instant replay reference?
Speed of the game:  Many baseball purest argue that if you allow instant replay it will interfere with the speed of the game.  They say that baseball is already a long game and instant replay will slow down the pace of the game down even further.  This argument is not valid because any time that a call is controversial the manager comes out to argue the call with the umpire, they yell and kick dirt.  While these managers may be humorous to watch it would be much faster to just have the umpire review the call, get it right and move on.  Watch how much time is wasted by then Chicago Cubs manager Lou Piniella.   Also keep in mind this a relatively tame rant for "Sweet Lou". 

Slippery slope: Purest argue that if you allow instant replay to expand to on the field calls there could no stopping the eventual push for instant replay to review every pitch of balls and strikes.  This fear is not founded in any sense of reality.  How about we cross that bridge if we get there? Not allowing a solution to fix a glaring problem for Major League Baseball because you are afraid of a hypothetical situation that doesn’t actually exist is ridiculous. 

The ability of instant replay to get the call right isn’t absolute and sometimes even with HD cameras and super-slow motion there will be times that instant replay wont have the right angle or someone maybe blocking the camera, but to simply not choose a solution that would improve the accuracy and precision of umpiring a baseball game is unacceptable.  Fans want it…umpires want it…come on baseball join us in the 21st Century. 

What do you think? Are you fan of the "human element" in baseball, or do you want them to get the call right?

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

What is Middle America? (Part I)

What is America’s political center? People on the far right and far left are easy to point out however there seems to be more difficulty in indentifying what is America’s center politicaly.  Well using poll data I hope to layout what Americas political middle might be. Now for this very antidotal blog post I will be using one source of polling data, Gallup poll numbers.  Now some may same, by choosing one set of poll numbers you are not truly finding the center you are only find the center of Gallup Poll numbers, which you would be correct in saying. However I am not publishing these finding for scientific research or claiming victory to be the first to find the center of political America, plus different polling sources conduct business in different ways, tallies group of individuals differently, it just brings far too many variables in the equation than I am willing to deal with. So with that caveat out of the way… let’s go.

Abortion: Well, this should be quick and easy...yeah right! Through reading a very thorough break down of poll numbers it seems a majority of Americans believe that abortion should be legal but only in a few circumstances most of which pertain to medical issues while such issues as lifestyle choices and elective decisions are not generally supported.
Average rate of support for legal abortion across multiple survey organizations since 1996.
Rate
Life of the woman
84%
Physical health of woman
83%
Rape or incest
79%
Mental health of the woman
64%
Baby would be mental impaired
53%
Baby would be physically impaired
51%
Would force teenager to drop out of school
42%
Woman/family can’t afford the baby
39%
Woman/family don’t want anymore children
39%
Couple does not want to marry
35%
Fertility selection (when fertility process creates multiple embryos)
29%
Would interfere with woman’s career
25%



While the debate over abortion has center around two main camps “Pro-Life” and “Pro-Choice” the polling data actually shows three distinct groups of people. The three groups break down as follows, 26% of Americans believe abortions should be LEGAL in all cases, 56% of Americans say abortion should be LEGAL ONLY FOR CERTAIN CASES, and 17% of Americans believe abortions should NEVER BE LEGAL. If you would like to see other break downs in support or disapproval feel free to check out http://www.gallup.com/poll/9904/Public-Opinion-About-Abortion-InDepth-Review.aspx#1 All kinds of other breakdown are available.
AMERICA’S MIDDLE ON ABORTION:  Legal but only for a few limited circumstances
Moving along alphabetically….
Budget & Spending: No hot issue here either…whew! Recent Gallup polling shows America divided on whose budget they support but maybe an edge on how to deal with the deficit.   Let’s start with something America seems to be getting closer to agreeing on. How to deal with the deficit? When given five choices on how to deal with the deficit America seems to be gathering behind spending cuts.
How would YOU want to cut the deficit?
Percent
Only with spending cuts
20%
Mostly with spending cuts
28%
Equally with spending cut/tax increases
37%
Most tax increases
9%
Only tax increases
2%


So with 85% of Americans supporting some form of spending cuts you would think it would be easy to get things done, however politicians have different priorities and what programs should be cut and what should be kept. But what about the overall budget? (R) Paul Ryan has a plan and so does (D) President Obama each with its own financial theories on which will get the economy back on track with that America seems to be completely split. Recent Gallup polling shows a dead heat between the two budget proposal with a significant number left undecided.

Republican/Paul Ryan Plan
Democratic/President Obama Plan
No Opinion
National Adults
43%
44%
14%


With numbers this tight you can bet that a difficult road lies ahead and aggressive campaigning will no doubt be in all of our futures.
AMERICA’S MIDDLE ON THE BUDGET AND SPENDING: Cut spending to balance our budget but no consensus can be met on which economic plan America would support more.


After seeing some of these numbers I am beginning to understand why politicians choose to “kick the can down the road” sometimes it doesn’t pay to take a stand when you are up for reelection.  However we must press on…


Civil Rights: Now post 9/11, our civil rights are not what they used to be and some would argue that forfeiting of certain civil liberties is necessary to ensure our safety but where would “middle America” stand on that issue?  Shortly after 9/11 the Bush Administration enacted “The Patriot Act,” a sweeping and comprehensive piece of legislation that altered many aspects of America’s privacy.  I will only pull out a few of the more well known practices that have been authorized by The Patriot Act but I encourage you all to read the entire link below.  
Regarding Enhanced interrogation techniques do you believe the CIA should have to abide by the same Geneva Convention standards that apply to the US Military?
Abide by Geneva Convention Standards
Should be able to use more forceful techniques
Other/Depends
No Opinion
57%
38%
2%
3%


One provision of The Patriot Act allows federal agents to secretly search a U.S. citizen’s home without informing the person of the search for an unspecified period of time. Do you approve or disapprove?
Approve
Disapprove
No Opinion
26%
71%
3%


Which comes closer to your view: The government should take all steps necessary to prevent additional acts of terrorism in the U.S. even if it means your basic civil liberties would be violated, (or) the government should take steps to prevent additional acts of terrorism but not if those steps would violate your basic civil liberties
Take steps even if civil liberties are violated
Take steps but do not violate civil liberties
No Opinion
31%
65%
4%


One other part to evaluate with this particle topic is how time has affected these numbers, while support was more evenly split in the time closely following 9/11 support of pro-civil liberties enforcement has increased and then leveled off.


MIDDLE AMERICA ON CIVIL RIGHTS:  These numbers have been difficult to evaluate, when America has been attacked support for an “any means necessary” approach understandably rises and Americans are willing to forgo certain rights to prevent future attacks, however support falls over time as Americans feel more secure.

Corporations/Regulation: Big business vs. big government both have been demonized by politicians and created hardened opponents on each side. But does Middle America support one or the other?
When ask whether you think it has too much power, about the right amount of power, or not enough power. This is how America responded about the following groups.

Too Much
About right
Not enough
No Opinion
Lobbyists
71
13
8
8
Major Corporations
67
21
9
3
Banks and financial institutions
67
23
8
2
Federal government in Washington
58
30
9
3
Government in your state
34
49
15
2
Local government
22
53
21
3


When asked: Would you like see major corporations have more influence, less influence, or keep their influence the same as it is now?
Totally Satisfied
Dissatisfied want more
Dissatisfied want less
Dissatisfied keep as now
No Opinion
29%
5%
54%
9%
4%


When asked: Do you think there is too much, too little or the right amount of government regulation of business and Industry?
Too Much
Right amount
Too little
No Opinion
49%
21%
27%
3%


When asked: Which of the following will be the biggest threat to the country in the future – big business, big labor or big government?
Big Business
Big Labor
Big Government
No Opinion
32%
10%
55%
3%


MIDDLE AMERICA ON CORPORATIONS/REGULATION:  American wants government to govern and corporations to conduct business however America does not seem to like crossover.  America does not support a lot of government regulation in the private sector or corporate influence on Capital Hill. America would like separation between CEO’s and politicians



Crime & Punishment: Most notably here is the death penalty, do you support or oppose. No charts or pretty graphs needed here. 64% of Americans support the death penalty while only 30% oppose it. 


MIDDLE AMERICA ON CRIME&PUNISHMENT: Yes to the Death Penalty



Drug Policy: Unfortunately this seems to be an area where Gallup polling doesn’t have anything more recent than 2008 so I will resist go and find other polling numbers and update this post at a later time when newer polls become available.  However polling numbers show growing support for legalizing marijuana in particular.

Support legalization
Oppose legalization
1994
25
73
1998
31
64
2002
34
64
2006
36
64
2008
44
54


MIDDLE AMERICA ON DRUG POLICY: Americans are slow relaxing their position on some regulation of drugs, only time will tell on this one. 



Education: So does Middle America want the government involved in a kid’s education?
When asked: Do you think the federal government should be more involved, less involved or keep the current level of involvement?
More involved
Keep the same
Less involved
No Opinion
43%
20%
35%
1%


The push for government involvement in education is not likely to go away either with more support among younger Americans than older.

18-34
35-54
55 and older
Federal government should be more involved
64%
46%
30%
Federal government role kept the same
16%
20%
23%
Federal government should be less involved
20%
32%
45%


MIDDLE AMERICA ON EDUCATION: A combined 63% of America wants to keep the same level of involvement or increase involvement from the government.


Energy Policy/Environment: Does middle America support “green” energy over fossil fuels? Does middle America wanting more drilling? Do American’s prioritize the environment over energy production?
When asked: Which of the following approaches to solving the nation’s energy problems do you think America should follow right now?




Emphasize the development of alternative energy such as wind and solar
66%
Emphasize the production of oil, gas and coil supplies
26%
Both equally
6%
Neither/Other
1%
No Opinion
1%


MIDDLE AMERICA ON ENERGY/ENVIRONMENT: Additional the number of Americans who support conservation efforts vs. expanding production of fossil fuels has evened from 64%-24% in 2007 to 48%-41%, so what do all these numbers mean.  Middle America is feeling the pitch of rising oil prices and Middle America wants ALL types of fuel resources, green energy and increased production of fossil fuels.  America wants cheaper fuel from either green energy or fossil fuels.


http://www.gallup.com/poll/146651/Expanding-Energy-Output-Trumps-Green-Concerns.aspx


Foreign Policy: Unfortunately I was not able to find a poll or polls that I felt would accurately rate how middle America feels about foreign policy because it is so expansive and broad a topic to try and cover. 


Gun Control:  This one is pretty simple; does Middle America want more gun control or less?
When asked: Do you feel the laws covering the sale of firearms should be made more strict, less strict, or remain the same.
More strict gun control
44%
Less strict/keep the same gun control
54%


Middle America on Gun Control: Even in the wake of shootings Middle America likes its guns.  Americans are NOT in support of making it harder to acquire firearms.


Health Care: You can’t discuss health care now without The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Aka Obamacare) coming up, so that is where our focus will be. Does Middle America oppose or support Obamacare? Does Middle America believe it will help or hurt our health care system?
When asked: A year ago, Congress passed a law that restructures the nations healthcare system. All in all, do you it was a good thing or a bad thing that Congress passed this law?
Good thing
Bad thing
No Opinion
46%
44%
10%



When asked:  Do you think the healthcare reform bill will improve, not change, or worsen medical care in the US?
Improve
Not change
Worsen
No Opinion
39%
12%
44%
5%



When asked:  Do you think the healthcare reform bill will improve, not change, or worsen your own medical care?
Improve
Not change
Worsen
No Opinion
25%
31%
39%
6%



MIDDLE AMERICA ON HEALTH CARE: Middle America is divided on Obamacare, some support and some appose, however with 56% of America believing it will either not change or actually worsen health care in the US; and 70% believing it will either not change or worsen their own medical care, Middle America is not ready to accept that Obamacare will improve their experiences when ill. 


http://www.gallup.com/poll/146729/One-Year-Later-Americans-Split-Healthcare-Law.aspx



Middle America Part I Conclusion: So what does all this boil down to? Middle America isn’t apposed to abortion in a few limited circumstances, wants to cut government spending, is willing to give up a few civil rights for a short time in the name of safety from terrorism, is not a fan of big government or big business, supports the death penalty, is softening on legalization of marijuana, wants federal support in schools, takes an “all hands on deck” approach to energy sources, doesn’t want it to be harder to get a gun than it already is, and doesn’t believe that Obamacare will help create a better healthcare system. 

Is "Middle America" where you thought it was…more conservative or liberal?   

Where are you in relation to "Middle America"?