Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Book Report: "Back to Work" by Bill Clinton

Bill Clinton’s “Back to Work” Part I

First of all, I absolutely loved this book.  I simply could not put it down, I was underlining, writing notes in the margins, referencing previous chapters, I was all over the place.  Normally I can only say that about the latest novel by Dan Brown, however President Clinton’s intelligence, experience, and passion for the subject matter leaps off the page.  President Clinton lays out a powerfully compelling argument for smart government and a relationship between that government and the private sector through cooperation.  



President Clinton makes no apologies for his disagreement with those in the Republican Party and the Tea Party, who he addresses in the book as the “antigovernment movement”, and really takes their policies to task with how they impacted our nation. From the beginnings of true deficit spending under President Reagan to current Tea Party Republicans who want to eliminate the EPA despite scientific evidence of climate change. President Clinton makes the case for why strong government is needed now more than ever.  I have to tell you now there is so much good content smashed into this book, that my little book review can’t possibly do it justice. But  there were some areas which stood out and I found especially compelling.  

Section 1: Where we are…

President Clinton provides a brief synopsis of the financial meltdown, I say brief because others have written entire books only discussing the causes which went into the 2008 collapse.  However a significant factor which contributed to the 2008 financial collapse, which President Clinton addresses, was banks were simply overleveraged.  In some cases overleveraged to the rate of $40 to $1. What does that mean?  For every $1 of capital they had on hand, these overleveraged banks had $40 in investments.  These banks simply didn’t have near the capital required to cover the massive loses that they took from risky investments, subprime lending, and the derivatives.  How did banks become so overleveraged?  The book doesn’t go it that however through some independent research I found that in 2004, under President George W. Bush's administration, the SEC allowed 5 firms (Lehman Brother, Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley) to more than double their allowed leverage maximum.  The maximum leverage ratio was raised from approximately $12:$1 all the way up to, in the case of Merrill Lynch, leveraging at a $40:$1 ratio.    

President Clinton also combats the idea that the Stimulus was a “failure”.  A majority of economist agree that the stimulus stopped the recession from becoming another great depression, and held the unemployment rate down 1.5% -2.0% lower than it otherwise would have been without the stimulus. So, why does the Republican charge that the stimulus was a failure go mostly unchallenged?  Because Republicans are referring the standard set by the Obama administration, who stated if the stimulus was passed that the unemployment rate would not rise above 8.0%.  Well as it turns out, the recession was much worse than most economist predicted and unemployment rose to over 9.0%, so by the standard which the current Obama administration set for the program it has failed in that aspect.  Despite the republican claim of failure, the stimulus did save millions of jobs and as President Clinton says in the book it “put a floor under the recession” ensuring it did not turn into a depression and that truely was a success for America. 

President Clinton spends a great deal of time in the book talking about “the debt”, and as anyone who has followed the political debate regarding the debt knows there are three ways in which you can reduce the debt: cut spending, cut spending or cut spending…..wait no that is the Republican Tea Party approach. In reality you have THREE tools: cut spending, increase revenues, and grow the economy faster.   President Clinton is under no illusions of where the money goes and what are the biggest drivers of our deficit: Defense, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and interest on the national debt.  Those are biggest drivers, and President Clinton has ideas to implement in each area (except interest on the debt), which are not normally discussed, that would save money thus lower the deficit.  Nothing can really be done about the the interest on the debt.  Interest on the debt can only be affected by reducing our debt as a percentage of national income.  However here are a few examples of ideas and solutions in those other areas. 

Defense – Switch Tricare (a healthcare plan available to all veterans) to a sliding scale based on income as long as we can do it without putting more of a burden on returning veterans who already face higher unemployment rate than civilians. 

Allow current non-compete government contracts to be opened to competitive bidding.  This could save billions of dollars in the defense budget.   

Social Security – President Clinton provides black and white numbers, breaking down the ratios for number of retirees (Baby Boomers) who will be recipients of benefits to the number of American workers who are paying into the system.  Right now the ratios are not looking good because of how large the baby boomer generation is, thankfully there is a light at the end of the tunnel which is the generation called “Millennials” a generation even larger than the baby boomers.  

To help keep Social Security solvent President Clinton suggests altering the “cap”.  There is a collection cap on Social Security taxes of $106,800 (did you know that?).  The Simpson-Bowles Commission suggested raising that cap to $190,000 in 2020.  Others have suggested removing the cap altogether for employers, or raising that cap to $190,000 sooner than 2020.   

Another suggestion is allowing seniors who currently receive Social Security benefits to reenter the workforce without it affecting there Social Security benefits.  

Medicare &Medicaid – President Clinton acknowledges the exploding cost of healthcare but dismisses Paul Ryan’s plan to turn Medicare and Medicaid into voucher systems.  One of the solutions presented in the book is adoption of the VA sterilization practices nationally, this uniform sterilization practice has shown dramatic reductions in hospital-acquired infection. This lowers costs and increases hospital efficiency. 

Additional follow an example put forth by the Mayo Clinic to reduce incentives for providers to run unnecessary test, all doctors are paid on salary.  Their income is not affected by how many test they run.   

President Clinton does praise Obamacare in one section in particular, the section of Obamacare which requires insurance companies to use at least 85% of premiums to pay for health care services, not profits or marketing. This item is noted especially because in 2009 during the heart of the recession insurance companies sharply raised rates on customers thus increasing profits 56%.   

Lastly President Clinton, who has recently had health concerns of his own, suggests to improve lifestyles and stay healthier, referencing the huge amount of money spent on preventable obesity related illnesses.  


Stay tuned for Bill Clinton's "Back to Work" Part II...

Monday, August 15, 2011

Super Congress Activate!

Super Congress Activate!
Well last week all appointed members for the first ever “Super Congress” were revealed and here they are in no particular order.
The Democrats -
·         Senator John Kerry
o   Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Senator for over 20 years, and former Presidential Nominee
·         Senator Max Baucus
o   Chairman of the Senate Committee on Finance been a Senator since 1978 one of the longest tenured Congressman in Washington D.C.
·         Senator Patty Murray
o   Chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and Committee of Veteran Affairs, serving in Congress since 1992.
·         Representative Chris Van Hollen
o   Ranking Member of the House Budget Committee and Congressmen since 2003.
·         Representative Xavier Becerra
o   Vice Chairman of the House Democratic Caucus and member and of the Ways and Means Committee , has been a congressman since 2003
·         Representative James Clyburn
o   Former House Majority Whip, currently Assistant Democratic Leader in the House Representatives and Congressman since 1993.
The Republicans -
·         Senator Pat Toomey
o   Former House of Representatives Congressman and current Junior Senator from Pennsylvania , has served in Congress 1999-2005 and 2010 to present
·         Senator Jon Kyl
o   Senate Minority Whip, Former Ranking Member in the Finance Committee, Former House of Representative Congressman and served in Congress since 1987. 
·         Senator Rob Portman
o   Former House of Representative Congressman, Former Cabinet member for George W. Bush (U.S. Trade Representative and Director of the Management and Budget office) and current Junior Senator from Ohio.  Has served in Congress or cabinet position since 1993
·         Representative Jeb Hensarling
o   Vice Chair on the House of Representative Financial Services Committee and served in Congress since 2003
·          Representative Fred Upton
o   Chairman for the Energy and Commerce Committee and has served in Congress since 1987
·         Representative Dave Camp
o   Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee and has served in Congress since 1991

Now I know that was very dry and boring but I feel it is important to note a few things regarding the “super congress” appointments:
1.       No member of the “gang of six” was appointed. This could be a positive, in that; everyone will have a fresh start and not coming in with prearranged deals.  However more likely this is going to be a negative, since there is such a small window to get a very large deal done, starting with an already known idea would have provided a great framework to start negotiations.   
2.       All the Republican members of the “super congress” have signed Grover Norquist’s tax pledge stating they will not raise taxes.  This could spell trouble just as it did in reaching our first debt deal and warrants us keeping watch. 
3.       No freshman congressman were appointed on either side, Only experienced, more tenured congressman who understand the importance of this deal were appointed and this should give us all optimism that both sides want a deal to get done.
What do you see in the appointments of the “super congress"?

Saturday, August 6, 2011

USA’s Historic Downgrade

USA’s Historic Downgrade

For the first time since 1917 America has had its credit rating downgraded by a significant rating agency, Standard and Poor’s.  This credit downgrade is likely to affect many aspects of the American economy from adjustable home mortgages to student loans, car loans, and credit card rates.  Standard and Poor’s has officially downgraded the United States from its highest rating AAA to its second highest rating AA+.  However like everything else in this debt crisis, even Standard and Poor’s downgrade is not without a bit of controversy.  White House officials have claimed that Standard and Poor’s medium and long term economic projections of America’s debt are “way off”, claiming a 2 trillion dollar error.  In an interview on CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360o Standard and Poor’s head of sovereign ratings John Chambers said the 2 trillion dollar error did not matter because it doesn’t change the debt-GDP ratio which will continue to rise over the next decade. 

Let’s take a look at that interview conducted by CNN’s Anderson Cooper with Standard and Poor’s head of sovereign ratings John Chambers.



John Chambers : “The political brinksmanship we saw over the debt ceiling was something really beyond our expectations; the US government getting the to the last day before they have cash management problems.  There are very few governments which separate the budget process from the debt authorization process.”

The inability of congress to put political ideology aside and compromise to reach a significant debt reduction plan WAS factored into this credit downgrade because it showed a fundamental failure of congress to compromise and govern as a divided legislative body. 

Cooper: Do you blame one political party more than the other?
Chambers: “No I believe there is plenty of blame to go around.  This is a problem that has been a long time in the making, well over this administration and the prior administration.  It’s a matter of the MEDIUM and LONG term budget position of the United States which needs to brought under control NOT THE IMMEDIATE fiscal position.  It’s one that centers on entitlements and its entitlement reform or having matching revenues to pay for those entitlements.”

So straight from the “horse’s mouth” we DO NOT have an immediate budget problem however for the United States entitlement reform and/or increased revenue is needed to fix our MEDIUM and LONG term budget problems.  Since we have divided government and one party cannot get EVERTHING they want (thats you House Republicans) everyone needs to compromise. 

When speaking to how the United States could have avoid this downgrade. 
Chambers: “It could have come up with a fiscal plan similar to something like Bowles/Simpson commission, which was bipartisan…and came up with sensible recommendations. “

President Obama and Speaker Boehner were getting close to a “grand bargain along the same lines as Simpson/Bowles and the “Gang of six”,  However media reports state that House “Tea Party” Republicans refused to compromise which forced Boehner to withdrawal from those negotiations.  President Obama pushed for a $4 Trillion bipartisan deal which would have put America’s credit rating safe from this downgrade.


Chambers: “I think a key debate coming up regarding the extension of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, because if you did let them lapse for the high income earners that could give you another $950 Billion.  I think the question there is:  A. will that be an top of what we have already achieved with the $2.1 Trillion or if that was agreeable you could in vision that being counted toward the 1.5 that the committee is hoping to achieve.”  

Chambers is providing an obvious suggestion to let the tax rates for “wealth/job creators” expire and use that money towards debt reduction.  Who else suggested that?  Right President Obama! It seems clear from this interview that President Obama was completely aware of the standards which this credit agency had laid out for America’s debt reduction agreement.  President Obama was fighting for a debt deal very similar to what is outlined here in this interview.  However Congress (House Republicans) was not willing to compromise and not willing to do what was necessary to avoid this credit downgrade. Now since the “grand bargain” was never achieved we cannot know whether President Obama would have actually been able to get the votes needed to pass entitlement reform but unfortunately we never got that far because of partisan politics in Congress.


This credit downgrade was predictable and avoidable however Congressional politics obstructed policy and once again the American people are left paying for it.  Ideological views stood in the way of practical solutions and on August 5, 2011 we saw historic consequences in the down grade of America’s credit rating. Will this serve as a wake up call for Congressional members?  I won’t hold my breath.  This down grade will likely lead to more of the “blame game” and finger pointing... (Sigh)


UPDATED: 8/8/2011

Markets responded to the S&P downgrade on Monday with even more massive sell offs, leading to a single day stock market drop of 632 points.  In the last two weeks markets have hit lows not seen since the economic collape in 2008.